AI-generated material is increasingly submitted as evidence. A detection result alone establishes no fact, but recording reproducibly what was checked and how helps whoever has to decide.
Keep the file exactly as received and obtain the original rather than a copy. Origma records the hash of every scanned file in the report, so anyone can later confirm it is the same file.
AI generation, provenance signature and alteration are assessed separately, with the grounds in the ledger. Contrary evidence is not erased, so it is clear at a glance which grounds the other side could contest.
The report records the engine and signature database versions and the time of analysis. Running the same versions on the same file gives the same result, so a third party can verify it. Exporting a signed PDF also shows whether the report changed afterwards.
The result is a probabilistic assessment, not proof, and inconclusive is a formal result. Audio and text allow a wider margin for flagging human files than images; keep that in the report so the decision-maker can weigh it.
This is general guidance, not legal advice. A scan result is a probabilistic assessment, not proof.