Checking a photo before you publish it

On deadline you do not need a perfect forensic examination; you need a repeatable procedure. The order below takes minutes and leaves a record of what was established and what was not.

1. Get the file as it was sent

Ask for the original file, not a screenshot of a messenger window. One capture removes most of the layers a check depends on. If the original cannot be obtained, that fact is itself worth recording.

2. Read the three axes separately

Do not read them as one lump. A signed capture with one region edited and an unsigned ordinary photograph are entirely different situations. Each axis has to be read for what it says.

3. Treat inconclusive as a conclusion

Inconclusive is not a failure, it is information. Because what was missing is written down with it, you can decide whether to chase the original or verify another way. It does not mean the photograph cannot run — it means you know what you are running.

4. Attach what you checked

Export the report into the story's record and you can explain later what you were looking at when you decided. The hash travels with it, so you can also prove it was the same file.

Frequently asked

How long does it take?
Usually seconds to a couple of minutes for one image. A deeper setting takes longer because more analyzers run.
Can I check several at once?
Drop several files and they go through a queue, with the distribution of verdicts shown together.
Is it acceptable to upload a source's file?
The file is deleted immediately after analysis and only the hash and report remain. Where the file must not leave the building, use the Windows app for paid members (Pro or above).
Can I quote the result in the story?
Please carry the fact that it is a probabilistic assessment. Rewritten as a flat assertion it makes a claim this product did not make.

Read next

This is general guidance, not legal advice. A scan result is a probabilistic assessment, not proof.

Try a file