How to tell if an image was made with Gemini (Nano Banana)

Image generation in the Google Gemini app, known as Nano Banana, is now among the most widely used generators. It is also the clearest case of a file whose result depends on whether you scan the original or a forwarded copy.

Originals carry several marks

Originals downloaded from the Gemini app often keep Google's C2PA signature together with a visible mark. Origma verifies the signature and also reads the visible mark, so such originals come back «Likely AI-generated» from provenance evidence alone.

SynthID cannot be read here

Google also embeds an invisible watermark called SynthID, but its detector is not public, so Origma cannot read it. When the signature and visible mark are gone, the call rests on pixel detectors instead.

Messenger copies are still weak

A copy received through a messenger loses its signature and metadata and is recompressed. As the box above shows, the newest Nano Banana models are a generator our detectors still catch poorly, so such copies often come back inconclusive. Inconclusive does not mean a person made it.

So check it this way

Whenever possible, get the original file from whoever made it. In a messenger, sending as an original file or as an attachment is more likely to keep the signature. If all you have is a copy, accept inconclusive as the conclusion and confirm the source another way.

Frequently asked

Why does the same image give different results?
The original has a signature and a mark; the copy does not. Without provenance evidence only the detectors remain, and they are still weak on this generator.
Do you check SynthID?
No, because there is no public detector. The report says plainly that there may be a mark we could not read.
Does inconclusive mean a person made it?
No. It means there was not enough to decide. Strong human-side evidence is reported separately.
Will this improve?
We keep retraining the detectors on samples from the newest generators, and update the gate numbers and this page together when it improves.

Read next

This is general guidance, not legal advice. A scan result is a probabilistic assessment, not proof.

Try a file